turnonmyheels: (David Boreanaz)
turnonmyheels ([personal profile] turnonmyheels) wrote2012-01-20 08:34 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Happy birthday [livejournal.com profile] essene

Breaking Scientific News: The G-spot Does Not Exist

The actual finding: Women who are capable of having vaginal orgasms have thicker tissue on the supposed G-spot area. Women who are not capable of having vaginal orgasms have thinner tissue on the supposed G-spot area.

Discuss.

[identity profile] ldthomps.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 02:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Heh. I'm not surprised, having gone on to some websites with detailed anatomy. The clitoris has these big wing-like projections that run back that way, and so maybe those are the thicker or thinner tissues that they're talking about?

I used to worry about not having vaginal orgasms, even knowing that a huge percentage of the population doesn't. Now I just enjoy the sex and try to be sure to have frequent orgasms, and it's a much happier place to be *g*.

[identity profile] turnonmyheels.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that's exactly what it is. For all that humans are all the same -- meaning the same species -- there's a lot of deviation between bodies. I've always likened the female vaginal orgasm to the male prostate orgasm, some people just don't. And that doesn't mean there's anything wrong with *anyone* we're all just very uniquely ourselves.

Now I just enjoy the sex and try to be sure to have frequent orgasms, and it's a much happier place to be *g*.

Yes, this, is exactly the attitude to have otherwise it loses all the fun. And what's the point of that?

[identity profile] dancetomato.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I still think that if there is an area that has thicker tissue and that area is involved in a vaginal orgasm, then that area could easily be called a spot. Just sayin'.

TMI Alert: My birthday girl and I are in Gettysburg lazing in our hotel room, and will put this research to the test. Yes we will. /TMI

[identity profile] turnonmyheels.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)
That's what I think too. I think that they're saying it conclusively doesn't exist because it's not identical for all people, which is ridiculous. *Nothing* is the same for anyone any where because every one is different. The article went on to say that the scientist hoped the statement: g-spot doesn't exist would make women who can't orgasm vaginally feel like there isn't anything wrong them because there isn't anything wrong with them.

I'm no scientist [obviously] but I think categorically stating something doesn't exist when there is proof that it does just not on every vagina in the world is just as wrong as saying everyone has one.

Please, research further and tell me of your findings!!!

[identity profile] crazydiamondsue.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I, too, give this TMI a supporto-gal thumbs up! Happy b-day trip and research project!

[identity profile] crazydiamondsue.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm...I always believed in the g-spot, because I seem to have "textbook" (now defunct) definition of a raised area located by curling fingers shallowly into the opening of the vagina and pressing up toward the navel. I've always been able to orgasm vaginally, and my vaginal orgasms are more intense than those achieved by clitoral stimulation only. I am Kinsey's wet dream.

However, having had sex with women and having had many frank discussions about sex with many women, I know that some women can only orgasm via direct clitoral stimulation, some women can only orgasm via masturbation and some women can have multiple orgasms, squirt and come from merely squeezing their thighs together. I've already looked at it as "everybody's different," much as Etta James and I presumably both have vocal chords, but I will NEVER have that voice.

I also think a lot of what features into orgasm is mental/emotional (for both men and women), since I have had hugely intense orgasms that had more to do with subjective stimuli (attitude, location, taboo elements) than with position or physical stimuli. And that's my Friday TMI!

[identity profile] turnonmyheels.livejournal.com 2012-01-21 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
I love it when you TMI on me. Some of my most intense orgasms have also been from subjective stimuli -- good sex really is about the brain and the emotions.

[identity profile] i-am-pondering.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's true. Before I really got off on having that area played with, but as my body has been changing over the last year it sometimes hurts now. The technique is the same as used before, but it feels different to me.

I think they may be right.

[identity profile] turnonmyheels.livejournal.com 2012-01-21 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
My problem with their statement is that it's so ... definitive. They're not really leaving any room for this works for some people, but it doesn't for others. I know too many people who can only come from clitoral stimulation or by solo-masturbation only to believe any one things works for any one person.

Your situation is extremely interesting to me, because it's a change from something that used to work and now is painful. I wonder if it's the changes in your body more than emotional/mental changes? Now *that's* a scientific study in the making!

[identity profile] essene.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you bb!

Also, scientists are WRONG. Our scientificly sound research conducted just today proves otherwise.

[identity profile] turnonmyheels.livejournal.com 2012-01-21 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
HOO-RAY!
ext_7696: (paige's life plan excludes you)

[identity profile] mosca.livejournal.com 2012-01-21 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
Well, there are no male bisexuals, either.

[identity profile] turnonmyheels.livejournal.com 2012-01-21 12:16 pm (UTC)(link)
You know what? I *completely* forgot that, shame on me!

[identity profile] ethrosdemon.livejournal.com 2012-01-21 07:27 am (UTC)(link)
TMI: I think this article is wrong based on personal experience.

[identity profile] turnonmyheels.livejournal.com 2012-01-21 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)
*g*

I just love it when they use all encompassing language.